Gustakhi Maaf Haryana: Pawan Kumar Bansal

Gustakhi Maaf Haryana: Pawan Kumar Bansal

Unscientific Approach to Haryana’s Declining Sex Ratio: A Critique by Dr. Ranbir Singh Phaugat

The Flawed Philosophy Behind Sex Ratio Discussions
The ongoing discourse surrounding the declining sex ratio in Haryana has been criticized by eminent researcher Dr. Ranbir Singh Phaugat. According to Dr. Phaugat, the focus on sex ratio, its decline, and equalization is based on an unscientific philosophy. While the statistics might be reliable, the underlying beliefs and plans surrounding them are misguided and lack both vision and wisdom. Dr. Phaugat asserts that the discussions often ignore the role of science and instead promote an agenda rooted in ignorance and unproven facts.

Factors Influencing Sex Determination
Dr. Phaugat emphasizes that sex determination is influenced by complex factors during fertilization, including genetic makeup, womb conditions, environmental influences, and molecular processes. He argues that the natural selection of sex is far more intricate than commonly understood. For instance, during times of war, when more males perish, nature tends to favor the birth of more male children. Similarly, during natural calamities, when male populations are significantly reduced, a greater number of females are born. These natural phenomena, according to Dr. Phaugat, are often overlooked in the current debates about sex ratio.

Government’s Misguided Agenda
Dr. Phaugat is highly critical of the government’s use of the sex ratio as a political tool. He claims that policies centered around improving the sex ratio are often designed to enhance the government’s social and political image. However, these initiatives, he argues, are rooted in ignorance and fail to consider the scientific principles behind sex determination. The unscientific approach of pairing statistics with misleading interpretations can result in policies that may, ironically, harm both males and females in the long run.

The Dangers of Unscientific Policy Making
The researcher warns that when sex ratio statistics are interpreted incorrectly, they can lead to discriminatory policies. While policies may seem beneficial to women, they could unintentionally discriminate against males, creating a situation of imbalance. Dr. Phaugat calls for a more scientific understanding of population genetics and the molecular basis of sex selection before any policy decisions are made. He stresses that unproven, politically motivated agendas could have long-term detrimental effects on both genders.

Conclusion: A Call for Wisdom and Science
Dr. Phaugat concludes that associating the declining sex ratio with government agendas aimed at bolstering political and social power is misleading. He urges for a more thoughtful and scientific approach to understanding the sex ratio and its implications, emphasizing the need for policies grounded in proven facts and scientific evidence.